Randomized comparison of moderate-dose methotrexate infusions to oral methotrexate in children with intermediate risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Childrens Cancer Group study

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly J. Lange ◽  
Julie Blatt ◽  
Harland N. Sather ◽  
Anna T. Meadows
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Moderate Dose ◽  
Oral Methotrexate ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Dose Methotrexate

Prevention of CNS disease in intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: comparison of cranial radiation and intrathecal methotrexate and the importance of systemic therapy: a Childrens Cancer Group report.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
D G Tubergen ◽  
G S Gilchrist ◽  
R T O'Brien ◽  
P F Coccia ◽  
H N Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Cns Relapse

PURPOSE This study (Childrens Cancer Group [CCG]-105) was designed in part to determine in a prospective randomized trial whether intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX) administered during induction, consolidation, and maintenance could provide protection from CNS relapse equivalent to that provided by cranial radiation (CXRT) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and intermediate-risk features. PATIENTS AND METHODS We randomized 1,388 children with intermediate-risk ALL to the two CNS regimens. They received either IT MTX at intervals throughout their course of therapy or CXRT (18 Gy) during consolidation with IT MTX during induction, consolidation, and delayed intensification. Systemic therapy was randomized to one of four treatment regimens derived from a regimen used by CCG in recent studies for this patient population and three more intensive regimens based on the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster trials. RESULTS Life-table estimates at 7 years show a 93% and 91% CNS relapse-free survival rate for the CXRT and IT MTX groups, respectively. The corresponding event-free survival (EFS) rates are 68% and 64%. The differences are not significant. Patients who received more intensive systemic therapy had a 94% CNS relapse-free survival rate on either CXRT or IT MTX, while patients who received standard systemic therapy had 90% and 80% rates for CXRT and IT MTX, respectively (P < .0001). Patients less than 10 years of age who received CXRT or IT MTX had 72% and 71% EFS rates if they received more intensive systemic therapy. Patients 10 years or older who received CXRT had an improved EFS (61% v 53%) with a more intensive systemic program. This was primarily due to fewer bone marrow relapses (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS IT MTX during induction, consolidation, and maintenance provides protection from CNS relapse in patients with intermediate-risk ALL equivalent to that provided by CXRT if more intensive systemic therapy is given. The CNS relapse rate with either CXRT or IT MTX is in part dependent on the associated systemic therapy. For intermediate-risk patients less than 10 years of age, IT MTX with an intensified systemic regimen provided CNS prophylaxis comparable to that provided by CXRT, whereas older patients had fewer systemic relapses if they received CXRT.

Low numbers of CSF blasts at diagnosis do not predict for the development of CNS leukemia in children with intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Childrens Cancer Group report.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2594-2600 ◽  
Author(s):  
G S Gilchrist ◽  
D G Tubergen ◽  
H N Sather ◽  
P F Coccia ◽  
R T O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Therapeutic Trial ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
Relapse Rates

PURPOSE This study was designed to evaluate the effect on CNS relapse (CNSR) and overall relapse rates of blast cells in the CSF containing < or = 5 cells/microL at the time of diagnosis of intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children entered onto a large randomized multicenter prospective therapeutic trial (Childrens Cancer Group [CCG]-105). PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied outcome in terms of CNSR and event-free survival (EFS) in 1,544 patients who successfully completed remission-induction therapy and had been randomized to one of four systemic chemotherapy regimens and to one of two CNS prophylaxis regimens. We compared outcome between 1,450 patients who had varying degrees of pleocytosis but no blasts in the CSF at diagnosis (blast-negative group) with 94 who had blasts detected in the CSF after cytocentrifugation but had a total CSF WBC count of < or = 5/microL (blast-positive group). RESULTS No statistically significant differences in overall CNSR or EFS rates were observed between the two groups and no differences were found when analyzed according to age or WBC count at diagnosis, sex, or type of CNS prophylaxis (intrathecal [IT] methotrexate [MTX] alone v IT MTX plus 18 Gy cranial irradiation [CXRT]). CONCLUSION In intermediate-risk ALL, there was no significant difference in CNSR and systemic relapse rates after standard presymptomatic CNS therapy between patients with a CSF WBC count < or = 5/microL and those without identifiable blasts in the CSF. These findings suggest that certain approaches to therapy, such as that used in this study, may eliminate the need for any additional special treatment directed at this subset of patients with CSF blasts.

scholarly journals High-dose methotrexate vs. Capizzi methotrexate for the treatment of childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasil Jastaniah ◽  
Naglla Elimam ◽  
Khalid Abdalla ◽  
Aeshah A. AlAzmi ◽  
Mohammed Aseeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

No Advantage of Dexamethasone Over Prednisolone for the Outcome of Standard- and Intermediate-Risk Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group L95-14 Protocol

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (27) ◽  
pp. 6489-6498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunji Igarashi ◽  
Atsushi Manabe ◽  
Akira Ohara ◽  
Masaaki Kumagai ◽  
Tomohiro Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Risk

Purpose To evaluate whether dexamethasone (DEXA) yields a better outcome than prednisolone (PRED) in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial for the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients and Methods Two hundred thirty-one standard-risk (SR) patients and 128 intermediate-risk (IR) non–B-cell ALL patients were registered from March 1995 to March 1999. After random assignment in each group, the PRED arm patients received PRED 60 mg/m2 during induction followed by PRED 40 mg/m2 over four intensifications in the SR group and three intensifications in the IR group. DEXA arm patients received DEXA 8 mg/m2 during induction and DEXA 6 mg/m2 during the intensifications. The maintenance phase was continued until week 104. Results Event-free survival rates at 8 years in the DEXA and PRED arms were 81.1% ± 3.9% (n = 117) and 84.4% ± 5.2% (n = 114), respectively, in the SR group (P = .217) and 84.9% ± 4.6% (n = 62) and 80.4% ± 5.1% (n = 66), respectively, in the IR group (P = .625). The primary reason for treatment failure was marrow relapse. Only two extramedullary relapses occurred in the DEXA arm compared with seven relapses in the PRED arm. Although complications were more prevalent in the DEXA arm than in the PRED arm, fatal toxicity was rare both groups. Conclusion DEXA administered at 8 mg/m2 during induction and 6 mg/m2 during intensification showed no advantage over PRED administered at 60 mg/m2 during induction and 40 mg/m2 during intensification in both the SR and IR groups.

Clinical significance of translocation t(1;19) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the context of contemporary therapies: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Uckun ◽  
M G Sensel ◽  
H N Sather ◽  
P S Gaynon ◽  
D C Arthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
B Lineage ◽  
The Individual

PURPOSE The nonrandom translocation t(1;19) has been associated with poor outcome in pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because most patients treated by contemporary therapies now achieve improved outcomes, we have reassessed the prognostic significance of t(1;19). PATIENTS AND METHODS Cytogenetic data were accepted for 1,322 children (<21 years old) with newly diagnosed ALL enrolled between 1988 and 1994 on risk-adjusted studies of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG). Forty-seven patients (3.6%) were t(1;19) positive (+); 1,275 (96.4%) were t(1;19) negative (-). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome were compared using standard methods. RESULTS Translocation (1;19)+ patients were more likely than t(1;19)- patients to be 10 years of age or greater (P < .001) or CD10+ CD19+ CD34- (P < .0001), or nonwhite (P = .02). Patients with a balanced t(1;19) were less likely to be hyperdiploid than patients with an unbalanced der(19)t(1;19). Event-free survival (EFS) was similar for the overall group of t(1;19)+ and t(1;19)- patients, with 4-year estimates of 69.5% (SD, 6.8%) and 74.8% (SD, 1.3%; P = .48), respectively. However, patients with unbalanced der(19)t(1;19) had significantly better outcomes than patients with balanced t(1;19): 4-year EFS were 80.6% (SD, 7.1%) and 41.7% (SD, 13.5%), respectively (P = .003). These differences were maintained within the individual studies analyses and after exclusion of t(1;19)+ patients whose cells were hyperdiploid with more than 50 chromosomes. CONCLUSION The overall group of t(1;19)+ patients, as well as the subgroup with an unbalanced der(19)+ (1;19) had outcomes similar to that of t(1;19)- patients, whereas patients with balanced t(1;19) had poorer outcomes. Thus, although the overall prognostic significance of t(1;19) has been obviated by contemporary risk-adjusted protocols, the balanced t(1;19) translocation remains an adverse prognostic factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document